This is a model response to a Writing Task 2 topic from High Scorer’s Choice IELTS Practice Tests book series (reprinted with permission). This answer is close to IELTS Band 9.
Set 5 Academic book, Practice Test 23
Writing Task 2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Many cities have areas where the only cars are taxis and buses.
Is this a positive or a negative development? What are the effects of this on individuals and society?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
Sample Band 9 Essay
Banning cars from the centre of various cities around the world has been a strategy to reduce pollution and encourage people to use public transport. It has had various positive effects for both individuals and for society as a whole.
Banning cars from the centre of cities seems to be a very positive development. Fewer cars on the road means less pollution and fewer fossil fuel resources being used up. Although the effect on resources might be relatively negligible, it can create a newer way of thinking regarding the dynamics of transport within cities and this could be the most important benefit to society. Some people working in the centre of these cities may complain about inconvenience, but many would agree that this is a small price to pay.
A reduction in the reliance of people on private vehicles is likely to encourage them to use public transport or even bicycles. Using public transport, especially the types that run on clean sources of power, will significantly raise air quality levels in cities, which will of course benefit everyone. The clean air could even further encourage the use of bicycles, which would in turn promote more healthy lifestyles and less obesity. This would contribute on an individual level to people’s well-being and a better and longer life, and on a societal level, it would lessen the strain on public health resources. Governments could encourage this by creating more bicycle lanes to make cycling easier and safer.
In conclusion, it is clear that banning cars from the centre of cities is significantly beneficial. Better health and ecology, as well as improvement in longevity and well-being can benefit individuals and the entire society.
Go here for more IELTS Band 9 Essays
In Modern Life cars play an important role in daily activities. It’s one of the inventions that make human’s life much easier, meanwhile it has it’s own drawbacks as well such as pollution, traffic and noise. Some people believe that although cars are useful, they should be banned in city center while other group of individuals are totally against it.
According first point of view, cars make the environment polluted and noisy and conclude that it should be banned in city center which is too crowded. They believe people have to waste their valuable time in heavy traffic jams. Moreover, they believe by reducing the number of cars in the streets government can save a huge amount of petrol.
There is another view which is against the previous one. People of this group believe that government shouldn’t banned cars in city center because a large group of people live and work in this area not in country side. In their point of view there are solutions for solving the former problems. For instance, by building multi-story parking spaces we can reduce the traffic problem because many cars are waiting and rounding to find a parking space which makes traffic jam or by using clean fuels for cars the pollution problem can be solved. In the worst situation, for reducing the number of cars government can divided cars into 2 groups by their number plates for entering the city center area .
To sum up, in my opinion it’s not essential to ban cars. Government can train people about using cars. It will be beneficial specially if they train children who are our next generation. The can spread using bicycles instead of cars in some hectic areas.
Текст Should cars be banned from city centres? с переводом.
Should cars be banned from city centres?
Нужно ли запретить машинам въезд в центры городов?
| Most people would agree that cars have made our lives much easier. They have, however, brought many problems as well. Many people now believe that there should be a total ban on cars from our city centres. Undoubtedly, this suggestion has both advantages and disadvantages. | Большинство людей согласилось бы, что машины облегчают нашу жизнь. Однако, они также принесли много проблем. Сейчас многие люди полагают, что машинам надо полностью запретить въезд в центры городов. Несомненно, это предложение имеет как преимущества, так и недостатки. | |
| There are many positive aspects to banning cars from city centres. To begin with, it would help to drastically reduce air and noise pollution. This is extremely important, especially as the carbon dioxide from car exhausts is seriously harming the environment and our health. In addition, it would probably reduce the number of accidents and generally make the city centre a more pleasant place to be. | Есть много положительных аспектов в запрете машинам въезжать в центры городов. Для начала стоит сказать, что это радикально снизило бы загрязнение воздуха и уровень шума. Это крайне важно, особенно потому что диоксид углерода из выхлопных труб наносит серьезный вред окружающей среде и нашему здоровью. Кроме того, это, вероятно бы, снизило число несчастных случаев и вообще сделало бы центр города более приятным местом для пребывания. | |
| On the other hand, banning cars totally from city centres would have its disadvantages. Firstly, it would inconvenience millions of people. Cars are faster and more comfortable than public transport and do not follow fixed routes. Also, it is likely that public transport would be much more crowded. If cars were not allowed access to all parts of cities then more people would use public transport. | С другой стороны, полный запрет машинам въезжать в центры городов имеет и недостатки. Во-первых, это доставило бы неудобства миллионам людей. Машины более быстры и удобны, чем общественный транспорт, и не следуют заданному маршруту. Также вероятно, что общественный транспорт стал бы более переполнен людьми. Если бы машинам запретили въезжать во все районы городов, то больше бы людей пользовалось общественным транспортом. | |
| All things considered, although there are many advantages to using cars in city centres, there is no excuse for people not to use public transport more often than at present. For this reason, I strongly argue that it would be better in the long run if cars were banned from city centres. | Принимая во внимание все выше изложенное, хотя имеются много преимуществ от использовании машин в городских центрах, у людей нет причин не использовать общественный транспорт чаще, чем сейчас. По этой причине я выступаю за то, что в долгосрочной перспективе было бы лучше, если бы машинам запретили бы доступ в центр. |
Источник: Spotlight, 10 класс
Should private cars be banned from city centres? q1WAw
Most cities now have pedestrian precincts and from time to time cities are in the news because cars have been temporarily banned from the centre to reduce pollution. However, no town council has yet had the courage to completely prohibit private motor vehicles from entering the city centre. There are several reasons why I believe this should be done.
The most important reason is pollution from car exhausts, which damages people’s health causing respiratory diseases such as asthma and bronchitis. At the same time, traffic fumes attack the stonework of historic monuments and buildings, while the
vibrations from passing vehicles damage their foundations. This, for instance, has happened to many old cathedrals in Europe.
A second reason why I am in favour of cars being banned is in order to reduce the noise pollution from traffic. This forces people to keep their windows permanently closed and may cause psychological problems, including stress and depression, among people living in busy streets.
A further reason is that most cities were not designed for motor traffic. A good example of this is the historic centre of Valencia, which has narrow streets and few facilities for parking. As a result, traffic moves very slowly and there are frequent traffic jams. Beautiful buildings are spoilt by always having cars parked in front of them and pretty streets become unpleasant due to permanent traffic congestion and exhaust fumes.
Finally, I am sure that if cars were banned, people would find other more pleasant ways to move around cities. For example, they would walk or use bicycles as these would once more become safe and enjoyable activities within the city. This in turn would bring about a general improvement in people’s health.
In conclusion, therefore, I strongly support the idea that traffic should be banned from city centres, as this would enable people to rediscover cities as pleasant and healthy places to live.
Most
have pedestrian precincts and from time to time
are in the news
have been
temporarily
from the
to
pollution.
However
, no town council has
yet
had the courage to completely prohibit private motor vehicles from entering the city
. There are several
why I believe this should
be done
.
The most
is pollution from
exhausts, which damages
‘s health causing respiratory diseases such as asthma and bronchitis. At the same time,
fumes attack the stonework of historic monuments and buildings, while the
vibrations from passing vehicles damage their foundations. This,
for instance
, has happened to
cathedrals in Europe.
A second
why I am in
of
being
is in order to
the noise pollution from
.
forces
to
their windows
permanently
closed and may cause psychological problems, including
and depression, among
living in busy streets.
A
further
is that most
were not designed for motor
. A
example of this is the historic
of Valencia, which has narrow streets and few facilities for parking.
As a result
,
slowly
and there are frequent
jams.
buildings are
by always having
parked in front of them and pretty streets become unpleasant due to permanent
congestion and exhaust fumes.
Finally
, I am sure that if
were
,
would find other more pleasant ways to
around
.
For example
, they would walk or
bicycles as these would once more become safe and enjoyable activities within the city. This in turn would bring about a general improvement in
‘s health.
In conclusion
,
therefore
, I
strongly
support the
that
should be
from city
, as this would enable
to rediscover
as pleasant and healthy places to
.
If you talk to a man in a language he understands, that goes to his head. If you talk to him in his own language, that goes to his heart.
Nelson Mandela
IELTS essay Should private cars be banned from city centres?
Coherence and Cohesion:
5.5
- Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
-
?
One main idea per paragraph
- Include an introduction and conclusion
- Support main points with an explanation and then an example
- Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
- Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
- Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
- Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
- Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
- Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
- Check your writing for errors
- Answer all parts of the question
-
?
Present relevant ideas
- Fully explain these ideas
- Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
-
?
Currently is not available
- Meet the criteria
- Doesn’t meet the criteria
Recent posts
-
5band
if scientists could create a pill that let you live twice as long while remaining free of infirmities, would you take it?
To live forever while preserving health and retaining the semblance and vigor of youth is one of humanity’s oldest and most elusive goals. Lets think about if scientists could create a pill that let you live twice as long while remaining free of infirmities, would you take it?
If one considers only…
-
5band
You are your child’s first and most important teacher. They are wat
This article discusses about observational learning of children. It talk about difference between kids and adults. Children tend to watch and learn almost things surrounding them such as behavior of parents, teachers, peers, and so forth. For instance, toddlers witness action of their siblings like
…
-
You live a new life for every new language you speak. If you know only one language, you live only once.
Czech Proverb
-
6band
The effects of speak second language
As our world becomes more and more connected through technological advancements, learning another language has a definite positive impact on work and study. We will reap a number of benefits from learning a second foreign language. Firstly, we can broaden knowledge about the culture, traditions and
…
-
5band
write about a famous place in your hometown
The event that year suddenly became famous around the world, sadly that popularity came from tragedy, from the bloody massacre of the US army. Half a century has passed, and thousands of works of art, books, and movies both at home and abroad have been written about this event. We are the young gene
…
-
Learning is a treasure that will follow its owner everywhere.
Chinese Proverb
-
6band
people are spending a considerable amount of time on the Internet, and thus spending less time with real people.
It is evident that, at present, people are spending a considerable amount of time on the Internet, and thus spending less time with real people. I strongly agree that although this use of the Internet has greatly increased the level of communication available, it has also had detrimental effects on
…
-
6band
Nowadays More And More Old People Have To Compete With Young People For The Same Jobs
At present, the number of individuals who are competing with youngsters for the same opportunities has increased / is increasing. This trend is reducing job options for the younger generation. In my opinion, this issue can be solved if colleges and universities prepare their students to compete with
…
-
To have another language is to possess a second soul.
Charlemagne
IELTS Essay Topics with sample answer.
IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample 275 — Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities
- Details
- Last Updated: Saturday, 03 September 2016 12:45
- Written by IELTS Mentor
- Hits: 78462
IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay:
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
Sample Answer 1:
There is a dramatic increase in private transportation around the globe over the last few years. Increased wages, economic prosperity and depletion in vehicle prices made easy for people to have their own personal car. However, this has led to various detrimental issues including congestion, pollution and safety. For those reasons, I believe that limiting the number of cars in bigger cities could mitigate those problems. Completely banning cars in big cities is not a plausible solution as it is unrealistic, however, restricting the number of such private cars would be an effective solution indeed.
Nowadays, traffic contributed a lot in widespread of pollution. Car smoke, traffic jams and loud horns of vehicles are few reasons that significantly affect the environment and people in many ways. People are more vulnerable to various diseases and many have serious health issues due to pollution. In order to tackle this issues, restriction on private car ownership should be imposed. Not allowing people to drive their cars in big cities is not possible while it is much reasonable to restrict the number of cars a family can own, the number of minimum passenger on each car while driving would be the two pragmatic solutions.
Additionally, in order to combat with traffic congestion, new road infrastructure have been introduced by various nations that include deforestation to acquire more space to build new roads, modern bridges and pedestrian pathways. Those development works could destroy the natural habitat of various species that could lead towards the extinction of them from various countries. Nevertheless, prudent decisions should be taken to enhance the number of roads without doing any harm to the natural environment.
On the other hand, personal vehicles are more convenient and safer than other means of transportation. This is not surprising that people often feel more comfortable and relaxed while driving their cars. Completely banning the use of private cars in cities would deprive people to travel freely and according to their own preference.
To sum up, controlling and restricting vehicles in large cities would definitely play a pivotal role in improving people’s health and would also help in controlling factors that are the cause of deteriorating situation of the environment. But banning the private cars completely in big cities is not a pragmatic solution in my opinion.
[ Written by — Fahad Sultan ]
Sample Essay 2:
Two common problems usually faced by a big city — traffic jam and air pollution, which are caused by many factors. However, most people tend to blame a large number of private cars as the greatest contributing factor which leads to the some people’s opinion claiming that the cars must be prohibited in the town. Although this statement seems plausible, I totally disagree that this kind of vehicle should be banned from the metropolis.
The cars are not only beneficial for the citizen as a user but also for the state, in increasing its income. If the existence of the cars in the large city is forbidden by the government, there will not be car trade in that town which consequently will reduce total sales of cars nationwide. This finally will decrease nation’s earning because car companies will drop their production for that country and the tax revenue from the car sales will diminish automatically. Furthermore, this will also reduce annual car-tax revenue in which for some countries, this kind of tax is their main earning source.
On the other hand, this will cause another problem, for the car owners in particular, in which the government should be involved to overcome this problem. By banning the use of cars in the big city, cars owned by the city inhabitants will be useless and eventually they must sell their cars because this can harm them financially. If we look at the large total number of cars must be sold and the fact that the owners do not want to sell their cars at a lower price, this might be a difficult problem to be solved.
Finally, a huge budget must be allocated to improve the alternative vehicles in the city and many countries will not be able to eventually do it successfully. The car is considered as one of the most useful inventions ever and banning them is not a pragmatic solution. We should rather take alternative initiatives to reduce the traffic jam and air pollution in big cities.
Personally, I strongly believe that prohibiting people to drive cars in big cities will generate some problems both for the state and the owners. Even though the cars contribute to the occurrence of traffic jam and air pollution in some cities, it must be the other ways to combat those problems without banning the existence of cars, such as creating underground transportation and green energies as a car fuel.
[ Written by — Cipto Troena ]