Exams are not useful эссе

Представлено сочинение на английском языке Нужны ли экзамены?/ Are Exams Necessary? с переводом на русский язык.

Are Exams Necessary? Нужны ли экзамены?
Before the exams many student feel nervous, lose appetite, suffer from insomnia and anxiety. So the question “Are exams necessary?” seems to be relevant. Why do all students have to pass the exams at certain stages of their life? Перед экзаменами многие студент нервничают, теряют аппетит, страдают от бессонницы и тревожных состояний. Поэтому возникает актуальный вопрос: «Нужны ли экзамены?» Почему все студенты должны сдавать экзамены на определенных этапах жизни?
Well, first of all, the exams are there to access and to find out actually what the students know. This helps teachers to set the standards for children of different ages and abilities. Secondly, if there are no exams, then children won’t want to learn. Exams are like accelerators of studying. Thirdly, exams hold teachers accountable for their teaching. So, the exams are made up not only for students, but for their teachers as well. The question whether exams should exist or not is being discussed and debated for many decades. Ну, прежде всего, экзамены для того, чтобы выяснить и понять, что в действительности знают студенты. Это помогает учителям устанавливать стандарты для детей разных возрастов и с разными способностями. Во-вторых, если не будет экзаменов, то дети не будут хотеть учиться. Экзамены выступают ускорителем процесса учебы. В-третьих, экзамены налагают ответственность на преподавателей за их работу. Таким образом, экзамены не только для студентов, но и для их учителей. Вопрос о том, следует, проводить экзамены или нет, обсуждается и дискутируется на протяжении многих десятилетий.
Many people claim that examinations are subjective. They test only a limited range of skills. Besides, students suffer from the consequences of stress and anxiety during exam preparations. This often results into poor performance in exams, even if a child was well prepared. Многие люди утверждают, что экзамены субъективны. Они проверяют лишь ограниченный спектр навыков. Кроме того, во время подготовки к экзаменам студенты страдают от последствий стресса и излишней тревоги. Это зачастую приводит в низкой успеваемости на экзаменах, даже если ребенок был хорошо подготовлен.
Opposed to this many psychologists say that children need a positive accomplishment. They need to be pushed towards higher achievements. So from this point of view, exams are even more useful for students, than for assessors. Parents should be also interested in exams, as they develop their children’s survival skills. В противовес этому многие психологи говорят, что дети нуждаются в положительных достижениях. Их нужно подталкивать к более высоким результатам. С этой точки зрения, экзамены еще более полезны для студентов, чем для самих проверяющих экспертов. Родители должны быть также заинтересованы в экзаменах, так как они развивают в детях навыки выживания.
Exams make students stronger and more confident. Not only they show a visible progress in certain field, but they also encourage students to strive for more. Экзамены делают студентов сильнее и увереннее в себе. Они не только показывают заметный прогресс в определенной области, но и заставляют студентов стремиться к большему.

From past to present, exams are often organized during courses and they are considered as a form to assess learners’ abilities. But, is it really necessary to hold these exams? As a result, nowadays some people argue that exams are not useful. I completely disagree with this idea and in this essay I will support my opinion with examples.
Firstly, thanks to exams we can determine capacity of students. There are many learners in every school or university and everyone has different level. For example twenty five students study math together in one class but not all of them are good at math and can get high mark. Therefore, if exam are arranged, teachers can know that their students are in what level in order to have appropriate teaching methods to help them increase their point.
Another reason why I disagree that exams give us the motivation to try our best. When we pass an exam we will feel excited and tend to learn hard to can overcome the next ones. Besides, exams will make us better control ourselves, overcome laziness, so that we can focus on goals with a certain amount of time that cannot be delayed.
On another hand, some people think that exams are not really helpful. Exams cause a waste of time and money for exam papers, examiners, etc. Moreover, the pressure of scores can cause students to cram their knowledge and learn by rote without understanding the basics. Some of them cheat in exams to get high marks.
To sum up, although some people argue that it is not essential to hold the exams, I think that the presence of the exams is very necessary. Personally, exams should be carefully monitored to avoid cheating as well as improve the quality of the test results.

From past to present, exams are

organized during

they

are considered

as a form to assess learners’ abilities.

, is it

really

necessary to hold these exams?

As a result

, nowadays

argue that exams are not useful. I completely disagree with this

and in this essay I will support my opinion with examples.

Firstly

, thanks to exams we can determine capacity of

. There are

learners in every school or university and everyone has

level.

For example

study math together in one

not all of them are

at math and can

high mark.

Therefore

, if exam

are arranged

, teachers can know that their

are in what level in order to have appropriate teaching methods to

them increase their point.

Another reason why I disagree that exams give us the motivation to try our best. When we pass an exam we will feel excited and tend to learn

to can overcome the

next

ones.

Besides

, exams will

us better control ourselves, overcome laziness,

that we can focus on goals with a certain amount of time that cannot

be delayed

.

On another hand,

that exams are not

really

helpful. Exams cause a waste of time and money for exam papers, examiners, etc.

Moreover

, the pressure of scores can cause

to cram their knowledge and learn by rote without understanding the basics.

of them cheat in exams to

high marks.

To sum up, although

argue that it is not essential to hold the exams, I

that the presence of the exams is

necessary.

Personally

, exams should be

carefully

monitored to avoid cheating

as well

as

the quality of the

results.

1 page, 439 words

Exam is a word that most students fear off. A word that has a magic power to change a happy person into a frustrated and nervous one. However, it is a big part of the school that all students have to go through. There are advantages in exams, but there are people who think the opposite that exams have more disadvantages to the students and should be abolished.

Some people say that exams should not be abolished, because they say that exams are the only way for teachers to see the student’s level, it builds high sense of responsibilities, and it gives him pressure that will be useful for him later in his life. The students also compete with not only themselves, but with other people. They do not want to see an increase in their knowledge. They want to beat their classmates to be on top of the class. Another reason is when the student knows that his hard work has paid off, he will feel a self satisfaction inside of him and he will be so proud of himself. So, those people who say that exams should not be abolished think of exams as a self test to see where the students are, and how good they do.

I personally think that exams should be abolished. Because exams are stressful and they do not show real results of the student’s hard work and mental ability. They favor people who are gifted or have good memory and good exam techniques, and neglect the less able students who actually need the most help. Even though, those who have good memories may not be very smart during the classes and may not understand most of what they are memorizing. In addition, teachers may grade student papers differently. Sometimes the same teacher will give the student a different mark to the same paper after a few months. Another important reason I think is that students should not be judged on their performance on one day. For example, if a student got sick before the exam and he could not study well and got a bad grade or failed with the fact that he is an “A” student. Therefore, I do not think it is fair for him.

1 page, 492 words

The Essay on What Makes a Good English Teacher

But what makes a “good” English teacher? Can teachers with a competent level of English skills be considered good English teachers? A list of attributes of a good teacher of English as a second language (ESL) would be very subjective. With that in mind, I would like to discuss the characteristics of a good English teacher based on my own research and experience. There are two common …

Finally, there are always going to be people who are with or against taking exams. It is a controversial issue in all countries. However, I believe in regular testing through out the year. I say doing projects during the year, grades for participation after every lesson, and having weekly assessment is the best solution and the most fair approach for this debate.

All Papers Are For Research And Reference Purposes Only. You must cite our web site as your source.

На английском языке Перевод на русский язык
Are Exams Necessary? Нужны ли экзамены?
Before the exams many student feel nervous, lose appetite, suffer from insomnia and anxiety. So the question “Are exams necessary?” seems to be relevant. Why do all students have to pass the exams at certain stages of their life? Well, first of all, the exams are there to access and to find out actually what the students know. This helps teachers to set the standards for children of different ages and abilities. Secondly, if there are no exams, then children won’t want to learn. Exams are like accelerators of studying. Thirdly, exams hold teachers accountable for their teaching. So, the exams are made up not only for students, but for their teachers as well. The question whether exams should exist or not is being discussed and debated for many decades. Many people claim that examinations are subjective. They test only a limited range of skills. Besides, students suffer from the consequences of stress and anxiety during exam preparations. This often results into poor performance in exams, even if a child was well prepared. Opposed to this many psychologists say that children need a positive accomplishment. They need to be pushed towards higher achievements. So from this point of view, exams are even more useful for students, than for assessors. Parents should be also interested in exams, as they develop their children’s survival skills. Exams make students stronger and more confident. Not only they show a visible progress in certain field, but they also encourage students to strive for more. Перед экзаменами многие студент нервничают, теряют аппетит, страдают от бессонницы и тревожных состояний. Поэтому возникает актуальный вопрос: “Нужны ли экзамены?” Почему все студенты должны сдавать экзамены на определенных этапах жизни? Ну, прежде всего, экзамены для того, чтобы выяснить и понять, что в действительности знают студенты. Это помогает учителям устанавливать стандарты для детей разных возрастов и с разными способностями. Во-вторых, если не будет экзаменов, то дети не будут хотеть учиться. Экзамены выступают ускорителем процесса учебы. В-третьих, экзамены налагают ответственность на преподавателей за их работу. Таким образом, экзамены не только для студентов, но и для их учителей. Вопрос о том, следует, проводить экзамены или нет, обсуждается и дискутируется на протяжении многих десятилетий. Многие люди утверждают, что экзамены субъективны. Они проверяют лишь ограниченный спектр навыков. Кроме того, во время подготовки к экзаменам студенты страдают от последствий стресса и излишней тревоги. Это зачастую приводит в низкой успеваемости на экзаменах, даже если ребенок был хорошо подготовлен. В противовес этому многие психологи говорят, что дети нуждаются в положительных достижениях. Их нужно подталкивать к более высоким результатам. С этой точки зрения, экзамены еще более полезны для студентов, чем для самих проверяющих экспертов. Родители должны быть также заинтересованы в экзаменах, так как они развивают в детях навыки выживания. Экзамены делают студентов сильнее и увереннее в себе. Они не только показывают заметный прогресс в определенной области, но и заставляют студентов стремиться к большему.

Нужны ли экзамены?/ Are Exams Necessary?

Download

Essay,
Pages 2 (443 words)






Save to my list


Remove from my list




Exam is a word that most students fear off. A word that has a magic power to change a happy person into a frustrated and nervous one. However, it is a big part of the school that all students have to go through. There are advantages in exams, but there are people who think the opposite that exams have more disadvantages to the students and should be abolished.

Some people say that exams should not be abolished, because they say that exams are the only way for teachers to see the student’s level, it builds high sense of responsibilities, and it gives him pressure that will be useful for him later in his life.

Don’t use plagiarized sources. Get your custom essay on

“ Should Exams be Abolished or Not? ”

Get custom paper

NEW! smart matching with writer

The students also compete with not only themselves, but with other people. They do not want to see an increase in their knowledge. They want to beat their classmates to be on top of the class. Another reason is when the student knows that his hard work has paid off, he will feel a self satisfaction inside of him and he will be so proud of himself.

So, those people who say that exams should not be abolished think of exams as a self test to see where the students are, and how good they do.

Read more: Exams Should Be Abolished

I personally think that exams should be abolished. Because exams are stressful and they do not show real results of the student’s hard work and mental ability. They favor people who are gifted or have good memory and good exam techniques, and neglect the less able students who actually need the most help.

Even though, those who have good memories may not be very smart during the classes and may not understand most of what they are memorizing. In addition, teachers may grade student papers differently. Sometimes the same teacher will give the student a different mark to the same paper after a few months. Another important reason I think is that students should not be judged on their performance on one day. For example, if a student got sick before the exam and he could not study well and got a bad grade or failed with the fact that he is an “A” student. Therefore, I do not think it is fair for him.

Finally, there are always going to be people who are with or against taking exams. It is a controversial issue in all countries. However, I believe in regular testing through out the year. I say doing projects during the year, grades for participation after every lesson, and having weekly assessment is the best solution and the most fair approach for this debate.

my essay is here. plzzz tell me your comments and give some advice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and correct my errorss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ARE EXAMS NECESSARY?

Students take many oral and written exams in the years of schooling. Pupils have

to be evaluated by their teachers to see whether they make progress or not. Some people

may argue that exams are not necessary so they should be abolished. However, they are

essential because exams test students’ skills and enable them to overcome their nerves.

Many people may claim that examinations test a limited range of skills. They favour

people, who have a good memory and techniques. They are theoretical and useless because

students may forget the subjects, which have been learned, as time goes by. However,

coursework and exams may test a greater range of skills. It may also be an efficient way to

measure the knowledge.

It has been argued that students may suffer from the consequences of stress and

anxiety during exam preparation so they may show poor performance in exams. Exams may

also lead to illnesses. However, many students may overcome their nerves so they may

perform well.

In conclusion, it is obvious that exams are necessary because they may measure

people’s abilities and how much they have learned. Some students may have an opportunity

to overcome their nerves. They should be optimistic towards examinations.

Hello,

The one thing I would recommend, since you have a good thesis, is that you personalize it. It’s one thing to say that «exams test students’ skills,» and then proceed to write in a general manner about it. But the best way to persuade the reader that what you are saying is true is to prove it. That can be done by making an example of a news article, a study, a book, a movie, or, best of all, in my opinion, something from your own experience.

The point is that you should be able to support your claim in some way that will add meaning and dimension, and, as I’ve said somewhere before, that which is personal is most universal. Likewise, if exams really do «enable [students] to overcome their nerves,» support it with a specific example. You can do it!

Hope this helps!

Ned’s advice is excellent. At the moment, you give a general description of one point of view, a general description of the other point of view, then say the second is better without any evidence. This is obviously not very convincing. In addition to using personal examples, you could also do some research on test taking. For instance, how have students’ skills improved or deteriorated in areas that have tried to move away from test taking? For that matter, how do you even judge such a thing without giving a test of some sort? What alternative measures of success have been proposed? What are the strengths and weaknesses of these alternatives? If testing still seems to be the best option, how should the tests be designed? Add some depth to your essay, and you will get a much better mark on it.

Some people may argue that exams are not necessary and that they should be abolished.

Some schools actually do not use exams… a college in California the name of which I can’t remember…

They favour people who have a good memory and techniques, and they especially favour people without language barriers and cultural barriers to cross.

This essay is very simplistic, and the topic calls for more complexity. The topic calls for consideration of how education would be without exams. Examination is an inexact science. Without exams, though, education would still be inexact!

It’s a good idea to find a couple of examples where exams aren’t used and compare them to examples where they were. Or just find a couple of people’s opinions/experiences for the non-exam side and debunk their reasons. There should definitely be more argument and comparison.

Добавить комментарий

Ваш адрес email не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *