One day robots will replace teachers in the classroom эссе

It is believed that human teachers will be replaced by the artificially intelligent teachers in the foreseeable future. However, I disagree with this statement because of various factors.

At the outset, the prediction of the replacement of teachers by robots would not be possible because of unnecessary investments. To hire the services of advanced robotic technologies, a big chunk of money will be required. Nonetheless, human educators will be available at relatively cheaper wages. Moreover, robotic teachers might be suffered from a lack of flexibility. It is because they would not be able to understand the emotional state of their students. Having controlled by their internal processor, these machines could deliver longer lectures without accessing the learner’s interest level. For instance, contemporary scientists are still struggling to inculcate emotional intelligence in robots.

Furthermore, there will be a human resource problem with the introduction of robot teachers in the institutes. As if all the teaching work will be taken from the machines, there may be unemployment problems for humans. For instance, the revolution of automatic machinery in factories caused such a scenario during the 1960s. What is more, pupils may not outperform due to less interest in their academicians by this approach. It is witnessed that students perform better in their curriculum, where they have a mutual understanding with providers. By opening their hearts to their teachers, they can grasp the knowledge efficiently. Varying grades in academic subjects are a good example of its that depicts the effectiveness of interest level in a particular teacher that would not be possible in case of A.I. Robots.

In conclusion, it is argued that the need for human teachers will be demolished due to Robot tutors. Nevertheless, the factors such as cost, rigid teaching methods, unemployment and low-interest levels are the main reason for my disagreement with the above-said notion.

Many people believe

robots

will be alternative

of

Change preposition

show examples

classroom

instructor

Fix the agreement mistake

show examples

very soon. I

competely

disagree with

this

statement. In

this

essay

i

Change the capitalization

show examples

will explain why it is not possible.

In

classroom

Correct article usage

show examples

teacher

is the key part

for

Change preposition

show examples

study

Correct article usage

show examples

environment. At

this

moment

a lots

Correct the article-noun agreement

show examples

of humans think

classroom

teacher

Fix the agreement mistake

show examples

will replace by

robots

.

Although

it is quite difficult to say

but

Remove the conjunction

show examples

what will be held but

i

Change the capitalization

show examples

think is not possible. In the

classroom

, maintaining

studens

and

provideing

valubale

lecture

Fix the agreement mistake

show examples

is difficult

work

Add the particle

show examples

but

lecturer

Correct article usage

show examples

made it properly.

For instance

, when

teacher

Add an article

show examples

asked pupils for homework

on

Change preposition

show examples

that moment. teachers

tech

Correct your spelling

show examples

us naturally.

Besides

it

they judge about the progress and pupils to how he/she .

Moreover

it is proved that class

teacher

is a great impact.

For example

, young people love to follow

tclassroom

Correct article usage

show examples

teacher

as

a

Change the article

show examples

idol

On the other hand

, without

robots

there

are

Change the verb form

show examples

a lot of

way

Change to a plural noun

show examples

to make

classroom

Correct article usage

show examples

interesting. Some humans think

in

Change preposition

show examples

neat

Correct article usage

show examples

future. Now technology has a great

numbers

Correct the article-noun agreement

show examples

of

Add an article

show examples

tool

Fix the agreement mistake

show examples

. by using artificial

engineeringg

it is really common like

robopts

. The use of

robots

in many

sector

Change to a plural noun

show examples

of industry,

specially

Replace the word

show examples

for

high risk

Add a hyphen

show examples

work.

Also

some

scients

invented auto

cadriving

, difficult surgery,

also

some

robots

work as a waiter. By

motivate

Change the verb form

show examples

from

Change preposition

show examples

that things

Change the determiner

show examples

some humans believe in

future

Correct article usage

show examples

robots

will be our

teacher

Fix the agreement mistake

show examples

.

In conclusion, the idea of

robots

studing

at

Change preposition

show examples

classroom

Add an article

show examples

is not good.I

am completely disagree

Change the verb form

show examples

with

this

Submitted by rasel_beck on Mon Aug 30 2021

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Word Count

IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.

A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.

Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

  • Some people hesitate to share information for research, survey etc. Lots of people believe to give most possible details about their for scientific research, business and the academic world while others do not trust to share some information freely. This essay will discuss views of people, why some people do not share and others share the same and will give my opinion for both.

  • It is an irrefutable fact that many nations have multi-culture societies in today’s time. It is believed by some that people from different nations and culture make them more attractive and beneficial environment for the host country. I completely agree with this idea. In this essay, I would shed light on some possible reasons for the support of my opinion.

  • Being an organiser of international sports events like the Olympics is considered as a matter of prestige for a country whereas some people opined that it is not good. Both of the viewpoints will be discussed in this essay along with my opinion and conclusion.

  • In this modern era, most of the people have become addicted to the consumer goods. The Living standard of the people has improved with these goods. Even consumer goods like automobiles, home appliances and mobile phones have become the status symbol for individuals. But, I think, the demerits of this trend cannot be overlooked.

  • In recent years, there is a tremendous usage of automobiles and plastic in our daily life. As a result, this is leading to increasing pollution and waste levels in the environment. In this essay, I will discuss how it is affecting common people and suggest some solutions to overcome the issues.

Simply put: Robots won’t replace teachers because they can’t inspire us.

In a world where young people are retreating more and more into virtual unreality, the teaching profession has become more important than it ever was. It is teaching that keeps it real – teaching that keeps young people alive.

It’s the talk of the town – when you say the word “future”, you hear “robots”. Artificial intelligence is rapidly growing, and that fear of losing your job to technology has become very real.

Even the tech wizard himself, Steve Jobs, believed that while technology can solve many societal problems, it’s not as simple as handing it over to a computer. At least not when it comes to teaching.

“The most important thing is a person. A person who incites your curiosity and feeds your curiosity; and machines cannot do that in the same way that people can,” Jobs said, according to a transcript of his famous 1995 interview with Computerworld’s Daniel Morrow.

As such, going by Jobs’ argument, the notion that intelligent machines will achieve higher greatness over one of an educator within a classroom is an inaccurate one that blindly disregards all that a teacher offers.

Gin Tan, a former English teacher at the Mont Kiara International School in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, believes teamwork further educates students, and that this goes way beyond the classroom.

“Teachers are not only there to support and gauge the needs of students in terms of their skill level and basic knowledge – teachers create situations for students to work together and collaborate.

“These lessons allow students to apply what they are learning to their everyday lives,” she tells Study International News.

With teamwork comes social interaction between students, teachers, administrators and parents. As the late psychologist Albert Bandura explains in the Bandura Theory, children learn in social environments by observing and imitating the behaviour and influence of others. Individuals need to feel a sense of belonging and have meaningful connections, all of which a machine cannot provide.

The reality is, the more connected people are to technology, the more disconnected they are (physically) to other people.

And the fact is, teachers are mentors. They are supporters. They are our inspirations. Inside and outside of the classroom, they are there for us. Better yet, they entertain us.

TheConversation:: What is the role of a teacher? https://t.co/QWgW3hpz6L

— VocEdAustralia (@VocEdAustralia) September 13, 2016

Nothing can be more boring than sitting in a classroom with a monotone, boring, non-humorous robot teaching us about the world we live in. Can you imagine a robot teaching the oppression of women in our society today with such passion and motivation that it inspires a young woman to sign up for the next Women’s March? Not likely. The most powerful divide between living things and artificial intelligence is empathy.

However, we live in a time of various possibilities and changes happening at every turn.

A leading educationist recently even predicted the replacement of teachers with robots to happen in the next 10 years as the new one-to-one learning revolution. This will apparently help students succeed way beyond their capabilities. Robots will ensure to take time for every student, providing them with individual attention, and allowing them to learn at their own pace rather than as part of a class.

‘Inspirational’ robots to begin replacing teachers within 10 years https://t.co/v4otxnwKD4 pic.twitter.com/Lg0HJ7qNhR

— IIAD Global (@IIAD_Global) October 12, 2017

The educationist, University of Buckingham vice-chancellor Sir Anthony Seldon, says, “everyone can have the very best teacher and it’s completely personalized; the software you’re working with will be with you throughout your education journey.”

This said-to-be more cost-effective way of learning delivers an approach of tailored learning where the robot will evaluate every response to adjust what is being learned and what needs to be learned. Therefore, the more advanced students can move forward with more work, whereas those that need extra help will be attended to, all within the same class.

But what we are forgetting is that robots are unable to create a culture of excellence. They are unable to push students to excel. Sure, we can’t deny the power of technology in education – but not to the point of completely replacing teachers altogether. Technology and teaching can coexist. Use robots as “learning tools” but scratch the belief that the future of teachers will result in a lack

Technology and teaching can coexist. Use robots as “learning tools” but scratch the belief that the future of teachers will result in a lack thereof.

Not every teacher is the same and not all believe in the same pedagogy, but students are adaptable. It would be unrealistic to put students in classrooms based on their learning style because the world does not function like that outside the classroom.

Children learn something new every day, and if it is a toss-up between knowing the date of the Civil Rights Movement or sitting with a new kid at lunch, I hope for the latter.

When it boils down to it, artificial intelligence is miles ahead of a teacher/educator when coming to efficiency. But I’ll leave you with Tan’s words:

“If efficiency is having the ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ answers – teachers and educators are human beings and are prone to making mistakes. But if efficiency means having a well-rounded education that focuses on student’s creative, academic, social and emotional wellbeing, then teachers win hands down.”

Liked this? Then you’ll love these…

Artificial intelligence, if used wisely, holds great potential for students, teachers

5 courses to graduate in so robots won’t steal your job

As computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree?

In recent years the expansion of information technology has made the idea of virtual classroom much more practical. Although, the computers are extremely useful for the students, they cannot completely replace the teachers.

Undoubtedly, there are a number of positive aspects to the virtualization of classrooms. One such aspect is how the computers generally make it quick and easy to acquire a particular piece of information. For example, a teacher looking for specific section from a law book can take ages to find it in comparison to a laptop. Additionally, the computers are perfect and do not make mistakes whereas human beings could sometimes be impeccable. Moreover, computers deliver the same quality of education at any time of the day.

On the other hand, the presence of a teacher in a classroom is exceptionally important due to several reasons. Firstly, teachers can share their personal experiences in order to provide better understanding of a particular phenomenon. Secondly, everyone does not have the quick earning ability in all areas of study. Mathematics, for instance, is an easiest subject for some while nightmare for others. A teacher can adjust their pace according to children’s capabilities. Lastly and most importantly, teachers can provide invaluable feedback and advise to their students, which play a significant role in their career development.

To sum up, I strongly believe that, even though the computers have become an essential part of education system in almost all the countries, it cannot replace the teachers. Pupils would always need a mentor to shape their career.

Could somebody please mark my essay.
I would really appreciate that.

Robots are the next big thing on the board. And, why not, when almost every aspect of life has been associated with the latest in technology, how could education the framework of the future, the backbone of the society, the requisite of a promising life – stay aloof from the branch of robotics.

So, this soon to establish a novel paradigm is associated with Artificial Intelligence.

At the annual OEB education technology conference, held in Berlin, Dr. Tarek Besold mentioned that the creativity of a robot has been portrayed by joke writing computer. At the same time, it explained the capacity of robots to pursue repetitive and factory-floor tasks.

But, can teachers be replaced by robots?

Imagine a few years from now, walking into a classroom, to meet the robotic teachers. Sounds fun, sounds interesting and at the same time unreal!

Experiment portraying a digital teacher

Jill Watson – was deployed as a teaching assistant, at the Georgia Tech University in Atlanta for a postgraduate course. For all those of you thinking, that Jill Watson conducted the experiment, the fact is that it was the subject. So, Jill Watson – was a robot. It helped students to answer the queries through an online forum. However, the cyber identity of the robot was not revealed.

And did the students like it?

Well, the students had no issue in asking their queries from Jill, however, they did notice that the new assistance was more prompt than others. In fact, it never got bored or tired ever.

While the robotic enthusiasts must be smiling away at the attributes noted as above, here are some pointers which are worth pondering on:

  • Well, definitely the fact, that the robot is a computer generated makes sure that not a single question goes unanswered, but, what about the adaptability to knowledge. That is of immense significance in the real world.
  • What about the emotional attachment! There are always the teachers which are more than just educators to you. They are the mentors. There is the factual insight and empathy associated. What about these traits?
  • Moreover, would the robot aid in the investigation or imbibe thinking aptitude in children?

Immense is left for speculation and improvisation.

Experiment of Pearson Education company

  • Pearson is the name in the field of global education. An experimental project is being conducted by them which are utilizing The Watson system.
  • A digital education project is being tested which inculcates an interactive textbook, an automated tutor and an online course.
  • A Watson-powered robot helper is integrated into the system of the student following lessons on the computer screen.
  • This particular project is presently in the laboratory phase.
  • However, since the Pearson and IBM have signed a partnership, novel steps and result are expected.
  • Yet again, it is not a replacement of a conventional teacher.
  • It is simply an amalgamation of online course, revision tutorial, testing and feedback on the same place.

Automation is definitely advancing. There is a high chance, that it could destroy jobs. But, then there is still a lot left in the hands of the users. Whether to let technology empower the masses or get empowered by the technology!

robot

Contents

  1. Will technology replace teachers?
  2. Teachers vs. technology
  3. Teachers and technology

‘Humans vs. Robots,’ ‘Man vs. Machine,’ ‘People vs. Technology’ — the debate has been around for years. Be it in movies or policy discussions, the possibility of technology replacing humans has been both celebrated and criticised. 🤖

With a technological revolution all around us, it’s hard to imagine teaching being an exception to this takeover. This article will explore what could happen in the world of teaching over the next couple of years.

teacher with a tablet in a classroom with children

Will technology replace teachers?

Over the past few years, scientists and experts have invested heavily in technology and robots that can help in improving children’s educational experiences. For example, robots have been used to aid students with personalised learning to learn at their own pace. 

In China, hundreds of kindergarten classes are assisted by a small robot named Keeko. Keeko tutors the children individually by telling them stories, posing logical questions, and even reacting with facial expressions when the children learn the content. In Boston, teddy bear-sized robots are being used to teach children English. 

Some specialised programs can even answer questions with more accuracy and efficiency than teachers do. In 2016, a Georgia Tech Professor used an artificial intelligence bot as an online teaching assistant. He only revealed the TA’s true identity to the students at the end of term. The students were very impressed and claimed they couldn’t distinguish the bot from a real human. 😯

Situations like these suggest that robots might be more efficient than human teachers. They can tailor individual lessons for each student and are accessible to the largest of classes. With such rapid advancement, what are the chances of robots replacing teachers and teaching your children? Let’s find out. 

Teachers vs. technology

It can be scary to imagine a classroom filled with robots and children relying on these metallic teachers like magnets; however, this might not exactly be the case. 

While it may seem that the development of technology has taken the educational system by storm, experts say that the possibility of robots replacing teachers isn’t that high.

There are many components that a human teacher brings to a classroom that a robot simply cannot. Here are two of the main reasons why robots will likely never replace teachers:

  • Reading social cues 👨‍🏫

A teacher’s job is not just limited to teaching. While robots may be more efficient in helping children learn, they are incapable of reading social cues that take place within the classroom.

One of a teacher’s primary roles is identifying difficulties students may be facing during a class. Robots can detect technical problems and act accordingly; however, they lack the ability to detect issues like speech difficulties or recognise emotions.

Teachers are important because children need someone to pay attention to their social cues and interact with them accordingly. Supporting a student requires a lot of empathy and understanding of human emotions, and robots aren’t exactly designed to do that. Your child needs humans to relate to, and teachers are essential to support them throughout this process. 

  • The ability to inspire 👩‍🏫

Teachers have the unique ability to inspire children to learn. Humans are social animals and inherently prefer to learn from other humans. Robots might be efficient in teaching facts, logic, and theories; however, they cannot practice skills like sharing and teaching from life experiences. Such unique human qualities are vital for growth and learning, and there’s no way robots can replace these elements.  

So, don’t fret! Your children’s classrooms won’t be resembling the scary sci-fi scenes depicted in futuristic, apocalyptic movies any time soon. 

Teachers and technology

Robots and teachers don’t necessarily have to be seen as one or the other. As mentioned above, robots are often designed and used to assist teachers in the learning process. This is another reason why robots won’t replace teachers: they need to co-exist. 🤝

Wondering how this is possible? Well, here are some pointers to help you understand:

  1. Some tasks can be tedious and repetitive. A lot of a teacher’s time is spent collecting homework, marking papers, and memorising content. These tasks can deter teachers from teaching effectively and efficiently. Robots can take over menial classroom tasks and save the teacher’s time and energy. 👌
  2. Many students face difficulties in their education due to various physical and mental health conditions, such as ADHD or paralysis. With the help of AI and technologies like Virtual Reality and Individual Learning Tools, teachers can use robots to integrate such children into the classroom better. In addition, teachers can use AI to recognise students’ potential disabilities in their classes before they even start teaching. This can help identify weaker students and give them the attention they may require.  

Rather than being a threat to human teaching, the advancement in technology actually assists teachers in ensuring that their children get to learn best with the resources available to them.

Education isn’t equal for everyone, but robots can help teachers lessen the gap. So, instead of worrying about robots taking over, try imagining technology and human teachers working together to help your children and give them the best learning experience.

This is exactly what we do at GoStudent. We leverage the power of technology to allow your child to learn in a healthy environment from some of the best teachers across the world. If you would like to give online tutoring a try, book a free trial session now.

What Might Happen If Robots Replace Teachers

by Terry Heick

Will robots replace teachers? Maybe–but it might not end up the way you think.

We’ve known for decades now that eventually, robots will do a lot of things humans have ‘done.’

There will be robots in factories. Robots that will clean your house. Robots that will diagnose your illness. Robots that will write poetry and compose symphonies and paint church ceilings–and then robots that create the robots that write poetry and compose symphonies and paint church ceilings.

And artificial intelligence is also coming. Machine learning will guide your life in ways that you may not notice–more of a gentle nudge in the direction of the fastest way to avoid traffic and get to work, or a suggested alternative product to the one you’re currently browsing on Amazon. These algorithms will be embedded in robots, of course, to diagnose those illnesses and write that poetry. We already have bots that write poems on twitter.

We have algorithmic art, too. Soon we’ll program the imminent robots to act out these otherwise purely digital tasks for the comfort of anthropomorphism. Not only will they know if you’re sad, but they knew you were going to be sad before it happened. They monitor vital signs, evaluate family history, your productivity, sleep patterns, and more, ultimately accessing trillions and trillions of bytes of always-accruing data for patterns.

And together, linked up not only with data, but every other machine and algorithm and its data-scouring efforts to, and a constantly-building history of similar efforts as well, its own intelligence will grow. This will allow it to begin to design its own artificial intelligence, rather than that designed today by humans and our comparatively limited capacity. These algorithms, too, will grow. And this growth will outpace our own ability to stop even for a moment to understand what’s happening.

So because this is all ‘inevitable,’ and because the planet will soon be full of metal-legged creatures constantly working to ‘make our lives easier,’ I thought it might make sense to get settled a bit with the idea.

So what will happen when robots replace teachers? Let’s first visualize a period of transition between all human teachers and all robot teachers. During this time, both robots and teachers will work together, to what degree depends on local policy on the integration of Robot-Based Instruction (RBI), along with Federal programs that incentivize this extraordinary innovation while also funneling dollars towards certain organizations that play nice with government priorities.

See Also What Technology Can And Can’t Replace In The Classroom

The Gates Foundation, too, will likely factor in somehow–perhaps in funding the purchase of carts to carry the batteries that the robots will quickly deplete meeting the needs of every student every day for every standard with a ‘no excuse’ policy added to the backend.

When robots replace teachers…

…teachers can help convince students that it’s not crazy to be taught by a robot.

…teachers can actually have time to plan.

…the robots can support and supplement teaching and assessment of learning while teachers can focus on building relationships with students, their families, and the communities they live in, contribute to, and depend on.

…teachers can save money by not purchasing a self-driving car because the robots will have replaced them too; they’ll show up at the door each morning and carry the teacher to school while reading them the latest headlines in RAN (Robot & Algorithm News).

…teachers can specialize in the abstractions that the robots may have trouble grasping or communicating–irony, compassion, affection, patience, curiosity, etc.

…teachers can brainstorm together to figure out how to market themselves as ‘irreplaceable’ in the home as parents, an uphill battle when working against the well-funded group ‘ORC’ (Organization for Robotic Caretakers).

…teachers could actually get summers off.

…teachers can work part-time to promote the humanities, civic participation, and other programs that had been de-funded back in the twenty-teens as financial support shifted towards ‘more practical curriculum’ and a form of mastery-based and competency-based learning.

…teachers can focus on understanding, wisdom, and meaning-making instead of the procedural elements of pedagogy.

…teachers can participate in professional development alongside the robots in a show of diversity and support for the machines being groomed/trained/programmed to ultimately replace them.

…teachers can’t possibly be blamed for the failure of the existing model of public education.

This post has been updated from a post by the author originally published in 2017

Добавить комментарий

Ваш адрес email не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *