Текст Should cars be banned from city centres? с переводом.
Should cars be banned from city centres?
Нужно ли запретить машинам въезд в центры городов?
|Most people would agree that cars have made our lives much easier. They have, however, brought many problems as well. Many people now believe that there should be a total ban on cars from our city centres. Undoubtedly, this suggestion has both advantages and disadvantages.||Большинство людей согласилось бы, что машины облегчают нашу жизнь. Однако, они также принесли много проблем. Сейчас многие люди полагают, что машинам надо полностью запретить въезд в центры городов. Несомненно, это предложение имеет как преимущества, так и недостатки.|
|There are many positive aspects to banning cars from city centres. To begin with, it would help to drastically reduce air and noise pollution. This is extremely important, especially as the carbon dioxide from car exhausts is seriously harming the environment and our health. In addition, it would probably reduce the number of accidents and generally make the city centre a more pleasant place to be.||Есть много положительных аспектов в запрете машинам въезжать в центры городов. Для начала стоит сказать, что это радикально снизило бы загрязнение воздуха и уровень шума. Это крайне важно, особенно потому что диоксид углерода из выхлопных труб наносит серьезный вред окружающей среде и нашему здоровью. Кроме того, это, вероятно бы, снизило число несчастных случаев и вообще сделало бы центр города более приятным местом для пребывания.|
|On the other hand, banning cars totally from city centres would have its disadvantages. Firstly, it would inconvenience millions of people. Cars are faster and more comfortable than public transport and do not follow fixed routes. Also, it is likely that public transport would be much more crowded. If cars were not allowed access to all parts of cities then more people would use public transport.||С другой стороны, полный запрет машинам въезжать в центры городов имеет и недостатки. Во-первых, это доставило бы неудобства миллионам людей. Машины более быстры и удобны, чем общественный транспорт, и не следуют заданному маршруту. Также вероятно, что общественный транспорт стал бы более переполнен людьми. Если бы машинам запретили въезжать во все районы городов, то больше бы людей пользовалось общественным транспортом.|
|All things considered, although there are many advantages to using cars in city centres, there is no excuse for people not to use public transport more often than at present. For this reason, I strongly argue that it would be better in the long run if cars were banned from city centres.||Принимая во внимание все выше изложенное, хотя имеются много преимуществ от использовании машин в городских центрах, у людей нет причин не использовать общественный транспорт чаще, чем сейчас. По этой причине я выступаю за то, что в долгосрочной перспективе было бы лучше, если бы машинам запретили бы доступ в центр.|
Источник: Spotlight, 10 класс
This is a model response to a Writing Task 2 topic from High Scorer’s Choice IELTS Practice Tests book series (reprinted with permission). This answer is close to IELTS Band 9.
Set 5 Academic book, Practice Test 23
Writing Task 2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Many cities have areas where the only cars are taxis and buses.
Is this a positive or a negative development? What are the effects of this on individuals and society?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
Sample Band 9 Essay
Banning cars from the centre of various cities around the world has been a strategy to reduce pollution and encourage people to use public transport. It has had various positive effects for both individuals and for society as a whole.
Banning cars from the centre of cities seems to be a very positive development. Fewer cars on the road means less pollution and fewer fossil fuel resources being used up. Although the effect on resources might be relatively negligible, it can create a newer way of thinking regarding the dynamics of transport within cities and this could be the most important benefit to society. Some people working in the centre of these cities may complain about inconvenience, but many would agree that this is a small price to pay.
A reduction in the reliance of people on private vehicles is likely to encourage them to use public transport or even bicycles. Using public transport, especially the types that run on clean sources of power, will significantly raise air quality levels in cities, which will of course benefit everyone. The clean air could even further encourage the use of bicycles, which would in turn promote more healthy lifestyles and less obesity. This would contribute on an individual level to people’s well-being and a better and longer life, and on a societal level, it would lessen the strain on public health resources. Governments could encourage this by creating more bicycle lanes to make cycling easier and safer.
In conclusion, it is clear that banning cars from the centre of cities is significantly beneficial. Better health and ecology, as well as improvement in longevity and well-being can benefit individuals and the entire society.
Go here for more IELTS Band 9 Essays
In Modern Life cars play an important role in daily activities. It’s one of the inventions that make human’s life much easier, meanwhile it has it’s own drawbacks as well such as pollution, traffic and noise. Some people believe that although cars are useful, they should be banned in city center while other group of individuals are totally against it.
According first point of view, cars make the environment polluted and noisy and conclude that it should be banned in city center which is too crowded. They believe people have to waste their valuable time in heavy traffic jams. Moreover, they believe by reducing the number of cars in the streets government can save a huge amount of petrol.
There is another view which is against the previous one. People of this group believe that government shouldn’t banned cars in city center because a large group of people live and work in this area not in country side. In their point of view there are solutions for solving the former problems. For instance, by building multi-story parking spaces we can reduce the traffic problem because many cars are waiting and rounding to find a parking space which makes traffic jam or by using clean fuels for cars the pollution problem can be solved. In the worst situation, for reducing the number of cars government can divided cars into 2 groups by their number plates for entering the city center area .
To sum up, in my opinion it’s not essential to ban cars. Government can train people about using cars. It will be beneficial specially if they train children who are our next generation. The can spread using bicycles instead of cars in some hectic areas.
IELTS Essay Topics with sample answer.
IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample 275 — Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities
- Last Updated: Saturday, 03 September 2016 12:45
- Written by IELTS Mentor
- Hits: 78463
IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay:
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
Sample Answer 1:
There is a dramatic increase in private transportation around the globe over the last few years. Increased wages, economic prosperity and depletion in vehicle prices made easy for people to have their own personal car. However, this has led to various detrimental issues including congestion, pollution and safety. For those reasons, I believe that limiting the number of cars in bigger cities could mitigate those problems. Completely banning cars in big cities is not a plausible solution as it is unrealistic, however, restricting the number of such private cars would be an effective solution indeed.
Nowadays, traffic contributed a lot in widespread of pollution. Car smoke, traffic jams and loud horns of vehicles are few reasons that significantly affect the environment and people in many ways. People are more vulnerable to various diseases and many have serious health issues due to pollution. In order to tackle this issues, restriction on private car ownership should be imposed. Not allowing people to drive their cars in big cities is not possible while it is much reasonable to restrict the number of cars a family can own, the number of minimum passenger on each car while driving would be the two pragmatic solutions.
Additionally, in order to combat with traffic congestion, new road infrastructure have been introduced by various nations that include deforestation to acquire more space to build new roads, modern bridges and pedestrian pathways. Those development works could destroy the natural habitat of various species that could lead towards the extinction of them from various countries. Nevertheless, prudent decisions should be taken to enhance the number of roads without doing any harm to the natural environment.
On the other hand, personal vehicles are more convenient and safer than other means of transportation. This is not surprising that people often feel more comfortable and relaxed while driving their cars. Completely banning the use of private cars in cities would deprive people to travel freely and according to their own preference.
To sum up, controlling and restricting vehicles in large cities would definitely play a pivotal role in improving people’s health and would also help in controlling factors that are the cause of deteriorating situation of the environment. But banning the private cars completely in big cities is not a pragmatic solution in my opinion.
[ Written by — Fahad Sultan ]
Sample Essay 2:
Two common problems usually faced by a big city — traffic jam and air pollution, which are caused by many factors. However, most people tend to blame a large number of private cars as the greatest contributing factor which leads to the some people’s opinion claiming that the cars must be prohibited in the town. Although this statement seems plausible, I totally disagree that this kind of vehicle should be banned from the metropolis.
The cars are not only beneficial for the citizen as a user but also for the state, in increasing its income. If the existence of the cars in the large city is forbidden by the government, there will not be car trade in that town which consequently will reduce total sales of cars nationwide. This finally will decrease nation’s earning because car companies will drop their production for that country and the tax revenue from the car sales will diminish automatically. Furthermore, this will also reduce annual car-tax revenue in which for some countries, this kind of tax is their main earning source.
On the other hand, this will cause another problem, for the car owners in particular, in which the government should be involved to overcome this problem. By banning the use of cars in the big city, cars owned by the city inhabitants will be useless and eventually they must sell their cars because this can harm them financially. If we look at the large total number of cars must be sold and the fact that the owners do not want to sell their cars at a lower price, this might be a difficult problem to be solved.
Finally, a huge budget must be allocated to improve the alternative vehicles in the city and many countries will not be able to eventually do it successfully. The car is considered as one of the most useful inventions ever and banning them is not a pragmatic solution. We should rather take alternative initiatives to reduce the traffic jam and air pollution in big cities.
Personally, I strongly believe that prohibiting people to drive cars in big cities will generate some problems both for the state and the owners. Even though the cars contribute to the occurrence of traffic jam and air pollution in some cities, it must be the other ways to combat those problems without banning the existence of cars, such as creating underground transportation and green energies as a car fuel.
[ Written by — Cipto Troena ]
Nowadays the big cities from all around the world propose to forbid the cars in the city center, but is it a good idea?
Firstly, we should talk about the public transport. If we ban the cars, then all the drivers should start to use it. However, these days the public buses or the tube is not a good example of efficiency. Indeed, the increment of the passenger number would increase the problems of punctuality. Concerning the price of the ticket, the general view is that it is really expensive and probably, many people couldn’t afford it and they preferred to use their own car.
On the other hand, the pollution is becoming a health problem in these places. The large amount of vehicles generates a permanent CO2 cloud in the sky, which affects the environment and the inhabitants. Another point in favor is that if we banned the cars, the traffic jams would disappear. As a result we would obtain an improvement on the buses service, with less delays and an increment of the frequencies would be established.
To conclude, we can say that although this measure would be hard for the drivers, there is no doubt about the benefits that it would provide.
Language (The language you are writing in)
Should cars be banned from the city centers? 8xNgk
Nowadays, some city has introducing vehicle-free day and private transport are banned from the city centre especially cars. So, should cars be banned from the city centre? Undoubtedly banning private cars bring about people’s inconvenience. Many people have to go to work every day so driving a car should be faster and convenient than taking a bus. Moreover, it will make people feel. uncomfortable when sharing the bus with a lot of strangers. On the other hand, banning cars still have advantages. It will reduce air pollution gradually if we don’t use our own car. Hence, it has people live better. In addition, this can solve traffic congestion, avoiding crookedness from driving in the city to parking problems. In conclusion, cars should not be banned from the city centre but vehicle-free days should be maintained to improve our life.
city has introducing vehicle-free day and private transport
from the city
from the city
go to work every day
should be faster and convenient than taking a bus.
, it will
when sharing the bus with
On the other hand
have advantages. It will
if we don’t
, it has
, this can solve traffic congestion, avoiding crookedness from driving in the city to parking problems.
from the city
vehicle-free days should
Do you know what a foreign accent is? It’s a sign of bravery.
IELTS essay Should cars be banned from the city centers?
This writing has been penalized,
text can’t be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion:
- Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
One main idea per paragraph
- Include an introduction and conclusion
- Support main points with an explanation and then an example
- Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
- Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
- Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
- Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
- Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
- Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
- Check your writing for errors
- Answer all parts of the question
Present relevant ideas
- Fully explain these ideas
- Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Currently is not available
- Meet the criteria
- Doesn’t meet the criteria
teenagers are not allowed to go out at night
In certain areas of US, teenagers are not allowed to go out without an adult due to the current conditions. As per my perspective, I think it is right that adolescents must stay at home or need to be supervised with an adult.
Firstly, recent times indicate a huge increase in the crime rate and drug
The limits of my language mean the limits of my world.
Some people believe that reading printed book are more beneficial while others believe that e-books better rather than printed books.
There are split opinions regarding reading books. One believes that paper books are more comfortable and convenient but others are opposite of this point and think that online materials are more lucrative. However, both has its own pros and cons; therefore, before commenting on my decision both the
It is deem by some that a dificult hobby is much more fun than others.
Some hobbies are relatively easy, while others present more of a challenge. Personally, I believe that both types of hobby can be fun, and I therefore disagree with the statement that hobbies need to be difficult in order to be enjoyable.
On the one hand, many people enjoy easy hobbies. One example
Learning is a treasure that will follow its owner everywhere.
consequences of greediness
once, a rich woman lived in a fine house, given to her by her parents. over time, her health deteriorated and so did her eyesight. ultimately, she became blind. when thus happened, the lady decided to call in a doctor to see if she could still be cured. when the doctor came to her house to check her
the replacements of trees insted of buildings around the cities. to what wxtend with this argumen?
The importances of increasing the number of trees in exchange of apartments around the cities has been recently discussed. Altough, it is significant to take step for protecting green space, the role of houses cannot be ignored in recent days in my opinion.
The structer of human’s life has been tra
The most intimate temper of a people, its deepest soul, is above all in its language.